? Game 3, All Stars Match of Royal Rumble Season 2 2009 Kuma(???) vs. Hwoarang(???)
Tag-Archive for » Winner «
February 19th, 2010 | Author: Royal Rumble
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 24 Comments
January 20th, 2010 | Author: Royal Rumble
Steve Austin was eliminated by Bret Hart, but an elimination isn’t official unless a referee witnesses it. The refs were busy breaking up a brawl on the other side of the ring when Austin was thrown out. The Rattlesnake quickly ran back in, and the elimination didn’t count.
Well, Austin last eliminated The Deadman to win, so there’s my question. Do you think that The Undertaker was the rightful winner of the 1997 Royal Rumble?
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 10 Comments
January 20th, 2010 | Author: Royal Rumble
Steve Austin was eliminated by Bret Hart, but an elimination isn’t official unless a referee witnesses it. The refs were busy breaking up a brawl on the other side of the ring when Austin was thrown out. The Rattlesnake quickly ran back in, and the elimination didn’t count.
Well, Austin last eliminated The Deadman to win, so there’s my question. Do you think that The Undertaker was the rightful winner of the 1997 Royal Rumble?
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 10 Comments
October 23rd, 2009 | Author: Royal Rumble
Well, if you win royal rumble, you get a title shot in a fixed match at wrestlemania, but with money in the bank, you can just come in when ever you want, where ever you want, and have you shot, even when the title holder is already just been in a match.
So, what do you think has the bigger advantage? Royal rumble or Mitb?
BQ… What do you prefer to watch, money in the bank or royal rumble?
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 9 Comments
October 16th, 2009 | Author: Royal Rumble
Obviously one of the world titles would have to be vacant. . and it’ll be the first time done since the 1992 Royal Rumble that Flair won for the WWF belt.
BQ:How much would this boost WWE’s current slagging ratings?
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 5 Comments
October 15th, 2009 | Author: Royal Rumble
There are three titles on three different brands. The winner of the Royal Rumble gets to decide which title he wants to compete for at WrestleMania, right?
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 21 Comments
October 13th, 2009 | Author: Royal Rumble
Steve Austin was eliminated by Bret Hart, but an elimination isn’t official unless a referee witnesses it. The refs were busy breaking up a brawl on the other side of the ring when Austin was thrown out. The Rattlesnake quickly ran back in, and the elimination didn’t count.
Well, Austin last eliminated The Deadman to win, so there’s my question. Do you think that The Undertaker was the rightful winner of the 1997 Royal Rumble?
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 10 Comments
October 05th, 2009 | Author: Royal Rumble
There seems to be too much happening before Wrestlemania so the tradition of the Royal Rumble winner getting a title shot dosent seem to happen anymore. Hence there always follows a match where the Royal Rumble winner loses his shot at Wrestlemania etc.
Now its going to be a triple threat match which kind of defeats the object of winning the Royal Rumble, yes its a title shot but not quite the same.
Do you think they should change the Royal Rumble so the winner gets something like a ‘money in the bank’ win?
Category: Royal Rumble
| | 14 Comments
